Skip to main content
Technical consideration

Semi-Coke as a Carbon Reductant for Ferroalloy Smelting

How semi-coke performs as a SAF reductant for FeSi, SiMn, and silicon metal production — specifications, sizing, cost comparison with metallurgical coke, and procurement tips.

By Panson Carbon

Panson Carbon
|

Submerged arc furnace (SAF) operations for ferroalloy production — FeSi, SiMn, and silicon metal — consume significant quantities of carbon reductants. Semi-coke (also called blue coke or lantan) has emerged as a cost-effective alternative to traditional metallurgical coke, offering competitive carbon content with lower sulfur and controlled reactivity.

Why Semi-Coke for Ferroalloys?

Traditional metallurgical coke has been the default SAF reductant, but semi-coke offers several advantages for ferroalloy producers:

PropertySemi-CokeMet CokeImpact
Fixed Carbon82–88%85–90%Slightly lower but compensated by lower cost
Sulfur0.2–0.5%0.5–0.8%Less S transfer to alloy product
Volatile Matter5–10%1–2%Higher VM aids initial reactivity
Ash5–10%10–13%Less slag, lower energy consumption
Cost (FOB China)LowerHigher15–25% cost advantage per ton carbon

Key Specifications for SAF Use

Sizing Requirements

Proper sizing is critical for SAF burden permeability:

  • 10–30 mm: Small SAF furnaces, mixed with ore fines
  • 20–60 mm: Standard SAF operation for FeSi/SiMn
  • 30–80 mm: Large open-top furnaces requiring maximum permeability

Fines Control

Fines (<5 mm) must be limited to 5–8% maximum. Excess fines cause:

  • Channeling and uneven gas distribution
  • Increased dust losses from the furnace top
  • Bridging in the charge column

Chemical Limits

For FeSi 75 production:

  • Ash ≤8% (lower is better — each 1% ash increase raises specific energy by ~15-20 kWh/t)
  • Phosphorus ≤0.02% (P transfers readily to alloy)
  • Sulfur ≤0.5% (less critical than P but still monitored)

Trial Methodology

Before committing to bulk semi-coke supply, ferroalloy producers should:

  1. Order a trial lot (20–40 MT, typically 1 container)
  2. Run controlled heats comparing semi-coke against current reductant
  3. Track: specific energy (kWh/t alloy), alloy grade compliance, slag volume, furnace stability
  4. Calculate: effective cost per ton of carbon delivered to the metal, not just cost per ton of reductant
  5. Document: any changes in tap frequency, electrode consumption, or furnace lining wear

When to Choose CAC Instead

Calcined anthracite (CAC) in lump form (10–30 mm) may outperform semi-coke when:

  • Higher FC (>92%) is needed to reduce reductant volume in the burden
  • Very low ash (<5%) is required for high-purity silicon or specialty alloy grades
  • Supply chain prefers a single Ningxia-origin supplier for both CAC and semi-coke
Call WhatsApp Email Quote